April 2019: An unofficial forum was launched ( link). ![]() December 2018: A new forum bearing the same name as the old one was created by one of the moderators.October 2018: This site no longer online.Skyscraper is an app developed with C++ that uses the graphics engine Crystal. He is the only Global Moderator outside of the Americas and the only Asian Global Moderator in this forum. Download the latest version of Skyscraper for Windows. Skyscraper Simulator PC A game combining the features of economic strategy and simulation. April 29, 2013: Test Tower was elected as Global Moderator, replacing John's position.April 13, 2013: John resigned from his Global Moderator position.November 29, 2012: NewEnglandElevators was elected as the second Global Moderator, filling gooper1's position as a result of his upgrade to administrator.Chris was replaced by gooper1, as selected by Chris prior to his resignment. ![]() A few months later, he quit the YouTube Elevator Community. September 28, 2012: Chris resigned from his co-administrator position.March 2009: Forum was created by Ryan Thoryk using Simple Machines Forum (SMF).In addition, both the official Skyscraper site and the SourceForge download site were also removed for unknown reasons. It went online again on April 29 and continued until October 2018 when it was finally pulled out from the internet and all the contents on it were removed. On April 15, 2018, the forum went offline unexpectedly for unknown reasons, with users reported receiving DNS errors while attempting to access the forum. Skyscraper Simulator Forum was created in March 2009 by Ryan Thoryk (known as "eventhorizon" in the forum), who also developed the Skyscraper Simulator program. In addition, both the official Skyscraper site and the SourceForge download site were also removed. There are more than 150 members registered in the new forum as of May 2019. The Skyscraper Simulator Forum (also known as Skyscrapersim. The old forum used the Simple Machines Forum (SMF) engine.Īs of June 2018, there were more than 900 members registered in the old forum. At the time the old forum was shut down, it had two administrators (eventhorizon (Ryan Thoryk) and SHADYWOOD79) as well as three global moderators (NewEnglandElevators, Test Tower ( EVTT), and June). A new forum was subsequently created by one of the members. ![]() The original forum was launched in 2009, but it was shut down unexpectedly in October 2018 for unknown reasons. It was also home of the discussion board of LiftSim software, which was moderated by mrmattandmrchay.
0 Comments
14 It has been proposed that acute kinking of the shunt vessel after ARC placement could account for increased morbidity and mortality rates in a manner similar to acute suture ligation of the shunt vessel, especially in smaller patients. 14 A mortality rate of 9% was also reported. In a retrospective study by Mehl et al, 14 80% of owners reported an excellent outcome despite 21% of the dogs being diagnosed with persistent shunting in patients in which an ARC was used for shunt attenuation. 5,13ĭespite the benefits associated with ARC use, compared with acute, complete ligation, the use of ARCs is not entirely benign. 5 This has been documented via measurement of shunt fraction by use of transcolonic portal scintigraphy. 12 Total luminal obliteration of a portosystemic shunt with these devices takes 4 to 5 weeks. 7 More recently, the rate of constriction has been shown to be influenced by the protein concentration of the surrounding fluid. 5,9 Factors including size, shape, encasement of the ameroid ring, and the type and temperature of the surrounding fluid modify the expansion pattern. Occlusion likely results from a combination of the following 3 mechanisms: reduction in external vessel diameter caused by centripetal swelling of the ameroid, fibroblastic response within the vascular wall at the site of application, and ultimate formation of intraluminal thrombi arising concentrically from the intima. 4–11 The ameroid core is surrounded by an outer stainless steel ring. Ameroid is a casein derivative that undergoes rapid volumetric expansion that plateaus in 60 days. One of the most commonly used methods for gradual attenuation is the use of an ARC. 5 Various methods have been described to achieve gradual attenuation and ultimate closure of the shunt vessel. This reduces the risk of developing acute portal hypertension or perioperative seizures. 3,4 Gradual occlusion of the aberrant vessel is preferred, thereby allowing the cardiovascular and nervous systems to adapt to changes in portal blood flow. Up to 68% of dogs with congenital portosystemic shunts will develop portal hypertension when surgically treated with acute shunt ligation. 1,2 Congenital, single, extrahepatic portosystemic shunts are the most common category in dogs and cats with a high incidence in certain breeds of dogs. Portosystemic shunts are vascular anomalies that divert portal blood away from the liver and into the systemic circulation. Results of this study indicated that the outer stainless steel ring of an ARC may not be necessary for attenuation and closure of some single extrahepatic portosystemic shunts. The inner diameter and luminal area of the R-group constructs did not change significantly, while the inner diameter, outer diameter, luminal area, and height of N-group constructs all significantly increased over the course of the study.Ĭonclusions and Clinical Relevance-R-group constructs had insignificant centripetal swelling without ring closure, whereas N-group constructs had significant generalized centrifugal expansion. Results-The inner diameter, outer diameter, and luminal area were significantly different between the 2 groups over the course of 34 days. Volume and weight of rings were obtained at the start and completion of the study. Inner diameter, outer diameter, luminal area, and height were measured for each time point. The ARCs were digitally imaged at day 0, daily for the first 10 days, then on days 14, 20, 27, and 34. Procedures-6 ARCs were immersed in canine plasma baths for 34 days without the stainless steel outer ring in place (group N), and 6 ARCs were immersed in canine plasma baths with the stainless steel outer ring in place (group R). Sample Population-12 ARCs (5.0-mm diameter). ![]() Objective-To evaluate and quantify in vitro dimensional changes of ameroid ring constrictors (ARCs) with and without the outer stainless steel ring in place over time. Some key dialogue replaced with intertitles (like in old silent films), which was fun to pull off. Removed most of Sir Kenneth Branagh scenes.Removed most scenes involving Tom Hardy, Jack Lowden, and “The Air.”.Removed all scenes involving Mark Rylance, the boys, and “The Sea.”.Changed beginning text to “Silentina”, a typeface used on silent films.Small adjustment to emphasize certain tones. Movie adjusted for monochrome black and white.Added 1930’s WB logo animation at the beginning. ![]() I went the opposite way from the Maple Films’ magnum opus, maximalist dramatic approach- I went with action, high-octane, boots-on-the-sand approach. Though I thought, what if we kept at a singular point of view? Would it be possible to maintain the suspense and intensity if we just stayed with the characters on the beach? That was where this edit came from. It did everything you know Nolan does- the characters longing out of situations, the three-arc intercutting climaxes, the whole time-dilation mindfuckery thing he does- all the greatest hits. When I revisited Dunkirk, I felt it was a top 3 Nolan movie. There’s nothing touching that, and I’m not planning on ever getting to that level. It just shows you how creative editors themselves contribute meaningful perspectives to the cinema canon. Maple Films’ “Finest Hour” is clearly one of the best fanedit supercuts ever made. But key dialogue are removed to serve the creative decisions. This is NOT a silent film since music, background voices, and sounds of stress still remain. TLDR: Limbo presents an intense, monochrome edit of Dunkirk as a non-stop series of events involving only the perspectives of soldiers at the beach. Includes technical help requests.įor the complete flair guide, visit the Flairs tab. Restoration/Preservation is for old movies that have been restored.Īnnouncement is for fan editors to announce new upcoming projects or make a post about a work in progress.įanedit Request is for users in searching for a specific fanedit that they cannot find, or requesting a fanedit to be made.ĭiscussion is for discussing fanedits, ideas for new edits, and editing. Series is for edits that retain an episodic form. Short is for standalone fanedits that are under 40 minutes. ![]() Includes FanMixes, FanFixes, and TV-to-Film.įeature Trailer is for trailers of upcoming features or series.Ĭlip is for clips from feature-length fan edits, as a way to preview specific changes, or a stand-alone clip.
![]() ![]() ![]() There are many water based grain filler that are fine for interior use, but I could find little info on how they would stand up for exterior use. With the System Three paste I was able to apply a very thin smooth coat of just enough epoxy to fill the grain and required minimal sanding afterward. The West System with filler would have probably worked as well with but would have required more sanding. Finally I will say that System Three is similar to Abatron with a liquid and putty but adds a paste epoxy that is the bomb in certain situations. If you are doing a lot of work it’s economical by the gallon compared to Abatron. Multiple hardeners, can be turned into a paste with wood flour / dust / synthetic fillers. I really like the versatility West Systems liquid epoxy resin. They seem to be ver similar products in short time use – but guess you would have to do a long term exposure test to say for sure. Would be good to know how the newer DAP Platinum Patch compares to MH Ready Patch. If you’re on a budget this might be the answer, otherwise I would prefer WoodEpox for large repairs over Water Putty. I have moved away from it in the recent past because while it is considerably cheaper than Abatron WoodEpox I have found that it’s rock hard characteristics make large patches wiggle free of the wood over time thanks to expansion and contraction. Unlike other wood fillers that shrink as they dry Durham’s Water Putty expands to fill the hole. Water Putty can work both outdoors and indoors, but without priming and paint, it will mildew and fail rather quickly outside. Drying time varies wildly depending on how big the wood patch is and the weather. Once it is dry, sand it smooth, prime, and paint. If you need it to stick to a vertical surface, mix it thicker.Īpply it with a putty knife or whatever tool is most applicable to your project, and let it dry. If you want it to self-level, mix it thinner. Mix the powder with water to whatever consistency you need. This product is extremely popular and it used to be a mainstay of my shop early on. You can also read the results of my 5-year field testing of most of these wood fillers and epoxies at The Wood Filler & Epoxy Test (Year 5) to see how these products performed in the real world as well as to watch the video below. Are you looking for the best wood filler or something more serious like a structural wood epoxy? Is it exterior or interior? Will it be painted or left natural? We’ll focus on answers to those questions as well. The type of material you should use will depend on what kind of patching or filling you need to do. I’ll help you determine the best materials (and there are lots available) to use when the time comes to patch wood on your projects. Sometimes it’s nail holes and sometimes it’s rotten wood, but your projects will often require you to patch wood. As as restoration carpenter I do a lot of wood filling and patching and all of these products have been invaluable to me at one time or another. In this post, I’ll give you my take on the 7 best products to patch wood on the market today. What are the best products to patch wood? Well, that largely depends on who you ask. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |